GTLB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

MongoDB has a net margin of 15.08% compared to GitLab's net margin of -1.85%. GitLab's return on equity of -7.4% beat MongoDB's return on equity of -16.23%.

GitLab has a consensus price target of $80.09, signalling upside risk potential of 13.88%. On the other hand MongoDB has an analysts' consensus of $364.34 which suggests that it could grow by 30.9%. Given that MongoDB has higher upside potential than GitLab, analysts believe MongoDB is more attractive than GitLab.

GitLab has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MongoDB has a beta of 1.246, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.568%.

GitLab has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MongoDB offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GitLab pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MongoDB pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GitLab quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than MongoDB quarterly revenues of $529.4M. GitLab's net income of $29.6M is higher than MongoDB's net income of -$9.8M. Notably, GitLab's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MongoDB's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GitLab is 16.02x versus 10.65x for MongoDB. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Palantir Technologies has a net margin of 15.08% compared to GitLab's net margin of 19.78%. GitLab's return on equity of -7.4% beat Palantir Technologies's return on equity of 12.27%.

GitLab has a consensus price target of $80.09, signalling upside risk potential of 13.88%. On the other hand Palantir Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $49.25 which suggests that it could fall by -38.26%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than Palantir Technologies, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than Palantir Technologies.

GitLab has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Palantir Technologies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GitLab has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Palantir Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GitLab pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Palantir Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GitLab quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than Palantir Technologies quarterly revenues of $725.5M. GitLab's net income of $29.6M is lower than Palantir Technologies's net income of $143.5M. Notably, GitLab's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Palantir Technologies's PE ratio is 398.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GitLab is 16.02x versus 72.50x for Palantir Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SentinelOne has a net margin of 15.08% compared to GitLab's net margin of -37.2%. GitLab's return on equity of -7.4% beat SentinelOne's return on equity of -17.96%.

GitLab has a consensus price target of $80.09, signalling upside risk potential of 13.88%. On the other hand SentinelOne has an analysts' consensus of $29.58 which suggests that it could grow by 24.97%. Given that SentinelOne has higher upside potential than GitLab, analysts believe SentinelOne is more attractive than GitLab.

GitLab has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SentinelOne has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

GitLab has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SentinelOne offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GitLab pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SentinelOne pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GitLab quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than SentinelOne quarterly revenues of $210.6M. GitLab's net income of $29.6M is higher than SentinelOne's net income of -$78.4M. Notably, GitLab's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SentinelOne's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GitLab is 16.02x versus 9.53x for SentinelOne. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zscaler has a net margin of 15.08% compared to GitLab's net margin of -1.92%. GitLab's return on equity of -7.4% beat Zscaler's return on equity of -3.26%.

GitLab has a consensus price target of $80.09, signalling upside risk potential of 13.88%. On the other hand Zscaler has an analysts' consensus of $226.04 which suggests that it could grow by 12.1%. Given that GitLab has higher upside potential than Zscaler, analysts believe GitLab is more attractive than Zscaler.

GitLab has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zscaler has a beta of 0.865, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.459%.

GitLab has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zscaler offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GitLab pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zscaler pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

GitLab quarterly revenues are $196M, which are smaller than Zscaler quarterly revenues of $628M. GitLab's net income of $29.6M is higher than Zscaler's net income of -$12.1M. Notably, GitLab's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Zscaler's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GitLab is 16.02x versus 13.31x for Zscaler. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.